How to read this page

Primary law is hosted; research is referenced. Every legal characterization on this site is graded adversarially against the primary sources in Part 1, which are archived in this folder as clean text and PDF so the chain of authority is inspectable without leaving the site. The research library in Part 2 grounds the structural and compensation design in published economics and professional-services scholarship; those works are copyrighted and hosted by their publishers, so we link out to the original source rather than rehost.

Retrieval dates are left UNKNOWN where not certain (not fabricated). Status legend for Part 1: primary-archived full primary text/PDF saved here · primary-cited-only authoritative source relied on and cited but not yet archived here.

Part 1 · Primary legal sources — hosted & archived

The controlling law for the creator-compensation question: can you pay a creator to promote or solicit for an adviser or private fund, and under what conditions. Each row links to the archived file in /legal/, with the pinpoint citation and the key sections flagged for the analysis.

Citation File Status Key flagged sections
15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)(1)–(2)
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 § 15(a)
usc-15-78o-a-broker-registration.md primary-archived § 78o(a)(1) core broker/dealer registration prohibition (“induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, any security” — the hook pulling a compensated creator/solicitor into unregistered-broker status); § 78o(a)(2) SEC conditional-exemption authority (statutory basis for safe harbors like Rule 3a4-1).
15 U.S.C. § 78c(a)(4)
Exchange Act § 3(a)(4), pinpoint (a)(4)(A)
usc-15-78c-a4-broker-definition.md primary-archived (a)(4)(A) core “broker” test — “engaged in the business of effecting transactions in securities for the account of others” (transaction-based / %-of-raise comp pushes toward broker status; flat content fees do not by themselves); (a)(4)(B)(i)–(xi) bank-activity carve-outs incl. de minimis 500 txns/yr; (a)(4)(C)/(D) — all bank-specific, unavailable to a non-bank creator platform.
17 CFR § 240.3a4-1
Issuer safe harbor · 50 FR 27946 (Jul. 9, 1985)
cfr-17-240-3a4-1-issuer-safe-harbor.md primary-archived (a)(2) absolute bar on transaction-based comp; (a)(4)(ii)(A) substantial non-securities issuer duties; (a)(4)(ii)(B) not a BD within prior 12 months; (a)(4)(ii)(C) once-per-12-months offering limit; (a)(1)/(a)(3) disqualification & BD-association screens; (b) no negative presumption from failing the harbor; (c)(1) scope limit — reaches only a natural-person partner/officer/director/employee of the issuer, so an unaffiliated third-party creator cannot rely on 3a4-1.
17 CFR § 275.206(4)-1
Investment Adviser Marketing Rule · adopting rel. IA-5653 (Dec. 22, 2020); compliance date May 4, 2022
cfr-17-275-206-4-1-marketing-rule.md primary-archived (b) compensation-for-testimonial/endorsement trigger; (b)(1) clear-and-prominent disclosures + (b)(1)(ii) material terms of comp; (b)(2) reasonable-basis belief + written agreement; (b)(3) ineligible-person disqualification screen; (b)(4) de minimis / affiliate / BD / Reg D 506(d) exemptions; (e)(5) “endorsement,” (e)(9) “ineligible person,” (e)(17) “testimonial.” NOTE: adopted rule does not use “promoter” (proposal-only).
17 CFR § 275.205-3
Advisers Act Rule 205-3 (qualified client), impl. § 205(a)(1) & (e) [15 U.S.C. 80b-5]
cfr-17-275-205-3-qualified-client.md primary-archived (a) carry permitted only if client is a qualified client; (b) private-fund look-through (each equity owner is a “client”); (d)(1)(i) AUM test; (d)(1)(ii)(A) net-worth test w/ primary-residence exclusion; (d)(1)(ii)(B) qualified-purchaser prong; (d)(1)(iii) knowledgeable-employee prong; (d)(3) “private investment company” (3(c)(1) fund); (e) inflation-adjustment — base amounts $750K (AUM) / $1.5M (net worth). CAVEAT: live thresholds live in the SEC order, not the rule.
17 CFR § 230.506
Reg D Rule 506(b)/(c)/(d)/(e) · 47 FR 11262 (1982), as amended thru 86 FR 3598 (Jan. 14, 2021)
cfr-17-230-506-reg-d.md primary-archived (d)(1) compensated-solicitor covered-person clause (“any person that has been or will be paid…remuneration for solicitation of purchasers”); (d)(1)(i)(C)/(ii)(C) “paid solicitor of purchasers” disqualifying events; (d)(2)(iv) + Instruction reasonable-care / factual-inquiry defense; (c)(2)(ii) accredited-investor verification methods (A)–(E); (b)(2)(i) 35-purchaser/90-day cap + no general solicitation (broad creator promotion pushes a raise into 506(c)).
15 U.S.C. § 77q(b)
Securities Act of 1933 § 17(b) — anti-touting
usc-15-77q-b-anti-touting.md primary-archived § 77q(b) anti-touting disclosure duty — reaches promotional/editorial content (“though not purporting to offer a security for sale”), any consideration “directly or indirectly” from issuer/underwriter/dealer, with full disclosure of receipt (past & prospective) and the amount (a bare “#ad” omitting amount fails); § 77q(c) touting duty not lifted by § 77c registration exemptions; § 77q(a)(1)–(3) fraud backstop.
17 CFR § 270.3c-5
Investment Company Act Rule 3c-5 (knowledgeable employee) · 62 FR 17529 (Apr. 9, 1997)
cfr-17-270-3c-5-knowledgeable-employee.md primary-archived (a)(4)(i) status-only KE route (GP/director/advisory-board member/exec officer, no tenure test); (a)(4)(ii) dual prong — genuine participation in investment activities AND 12-month tenure (a paid promoter/marketer fails “participates in investment activities”); (a)(3) “Executive Officer” (nominal title insufficient); (b)(1)–(2) KE holdings excluded from 3(c)(1)/3(c)(7) headcount. Caveat: 3c-5 governs only headcount, not broker-registration or Marketing-Rule issues.
In re Ranieri Partners LLC & Donald W. Phillips
Exch. Act Rel. 69091 / IA Rel. 3563, AP File 3-15234 (Mar. 8, 2013)
sec-ranieri-partners-2013.pdf · .md primary-archived HOLDING: transaction-based comp for solicitation (1% / 0.3% of capital commitments, ~$2.4M paid) = operating as unregistered broker under Exch. Act § 15(a); solicitation prongs (sending PPMs/subscription docs, urging allocation, sharing analysis/other-investor info); firm liability (¶18) + individual liability (¶20/¶22, Phillips aided & abetted); sanctions ($375K firm penalty; Phillips 9-mo supervisory suspension + $75K).
In re Van Eck Associates Corp.
IA Act Rel. 6560 / Inv. Co. Act Rel. 35132, AP File 3-21857 (Feb. 16, 2024) — BUZZ ETF finfluencer comp
sec-vaneck-buzz-2024.pdf · .md primary-archived ¶2 AUM-threshold fee pivot (flat → success-linked to incentivize influencer); ¶8 original flat 20% proposal; ¶10 success-linked scale (20%→as much as 60% above $1.25B AUM) + influencer equity; ¶15 disclosure defect (disclosed 20% flat, hid sliding scale from Board); ¶24 AUM-linked comp material to profitability; Violations ¶¶27–29 (Inv. Co. Act § 15(c); Advisers Act § 206(2); § 206(4)/Rule 206(4)-7); sanctions cease-and-desist + censure + $1.75M penalty.
Investment Adviser Marketing (final rule)
IA Act Rel. IA-5653, File S7-21-19 (Dec. 22, 2020); eff. May 4, 2021; 430 pp.
sec-marketing-rule-release-ia-5653.pdf · .md primary-archived “A promoter also may be acting as a broker or dealer” note (§ II.C.5.e, pp. 55–56 — promoter's own § 15(a) BD-registration duty); withdrawal of 1979 no-registration position for solicitors; supervised-person carve-out; operative rule 206(4)-1(b)(1)–(4) compensated-endorsement stack; de minimis $1,000/12-mo (e)(2); “ineligible person” (e)(9); endorsement/testimonial defs (e)(5),(e)(17).
SEC Div. of Examinations Risk Alert
“Additional Observations Regarding Advisers' Compliance with the Marketing Rule” (Dec. 16, 2025) — Rule 206(4)-1(b) & (c)
sec-finfluencer-risk-alert-2025.pdf · .md primary-archived § II.A disclosure defects (hyperlinked / small-font disclosures fail clear-and-prominent under (b)(1)(i)); (b)(1)(ii) material terms — social-media influencers named as compensated promoters; fn 16 quantum-of-comp detail (amount / % / period); (b)(2)(i)–(ii) reasonable-basis belief + written agreement; de minimis $1,000-over-12-months aggregation trap ((b)(4)(i)/(e)(2)); fn 4 promoter's own IA and/or § 15(a) BD-registration duty. Caveat: staff statement, “no legal force or effect.”
Live qualified-client dollar-amount order
SEC order under Advisers Act § 205(e) (e.g. IA-6961 / the ~May 1, 2026 five-year adjustment)
not archived here — pull next to close the chain primary-cited-only Rule 205-3(d)(1)(i)/(ii)(A) point to “the applicable dollar amount specified in the most recent order” — the operative carry-eligibility thresholds must be cited from this Federal Register order, not from § 275.205-3 itself (which carries only the $750K / $1.5M base amounts). Source: sec.gov/rules/other.

Full manifest with retrieval notes: legal/MANIFEST.md. Primary law is grounded through the SEC / GPO / Cornell LII sources cited in each file header (Cornell LII & sec.gov URLs are recorded per row in the manifest).

Part 2 · Research & academic sources — link-out, not rehosted

The platform-economics, professional-services, contract-theory, and creator-economy literature behind the structural design (six literature maps; see the source manifest). These works are copyrighted and hosted by their publishers — each row links out to the original source; nothing here is rehosted. Tier: academic peer-reviewed / working paper / Nobel material · practitioner trade press / blog / study notes · book no free full text.

Citation Tier Original source (link out)
Rochet & Tirole (2003), Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc.academicdoi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212
Rochet & Tirole (2006), Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report, RAND J. Econ.academicdoi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
Armstrong (2006), Competition in Two-Sided Markets, RAND J. Econ.academicdoi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x
Rysman (2009), The Economics of Two-Sided Markets, J. Econ. Perspectivesacademicdoi.org/10.1257/jep.23.3.125
Katz & Shapiro (1985), Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility, Am. Econ. Rev.academicjstor.org/stable/1814809
Hagiu, HBS Working Paper 07-077 (platform / two-sided design)academichbs.edu/…/07-077.pdf
Eisenmann, Parker & Van Alstyne (2006), Strategies for Two-Sided Markets, Harvard Business Reviewpractitionerhbr.org/2006/10/strategies-for-two-sided-markets
Garicano & Hubbard (2003/2009), Specialization, Firms, and Markets: Division of Labor Within & Between Law Firms, J. Law Econ. Org.academicdoi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewp002
Garicano & Hubbard, Hierarchies in law firms (companion)academicdoi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm035
Gilson & Mnookin (1985), Sharing Among the Human Capitalists, Stanford Law Reviewacademicjstor.org/stable/1228694
Morley (2019), Why Law Firms Collapse, Boston Univ. Law Reviewacademicscholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2532
Morley (2017), professional-firm essay, Columbia Law & Econ.academicscholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship
O'Mahoney, Leverage in professional-service (consulting) firms (eBook)bookOxford University Press
Jensen & Meckling (1976), Theory of the Firm: Agency Costs & Ownership Structure, J. Financial Econ.academicdoi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Holmström (1982), Moral Hazard in Teams, Bell J. Econ.academicjstor.org/stable/3003457
Lazear & Rosen (1981), Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts, J. Political Econ.academicnber.org/papers/w0401
Kandel & Lazear (1992), Peer Pressure and Partnerships, J. Political Econ.academicdoi.org/10.1086/261840
Corgnet, Hernán-González & Rassenti (2013), Peer Pressure & Moral Hazard in TeamsacademicChapman ESI working paper
Alchian & Demsetz (1972), Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization (study notes)practitionerjstor.org/stable/1815199 (original)
Akerlof (1970), The Market for Lemons, Q. J. Econ.academicdoi.org/10.2307/1879431
Nobel Committee (2010), scientific background: search & matching frictions (DMP)academicnobelprize.org/…/2010
Hart (2016), Nobel lecture / Incomplete Contracts and Controlacademicnobelprize.org/…/2016/hart
Roth & Sotomayor, Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling (book)bookCambridge University Press
Sargent / Jovanovic, learning models (study notes)practitionerJovanovic (1979), JPE (original)
Stable-marriage / school-choice matching (study notes)practitionerGale & Shapley (1962), Amer. Math. Monthly (original)
Fiveable, signaling / screening study notespractitionerlibrary.fiveable.me
Gompers & Lerner (1998/9), VC fundraising / deal selectionacademicnber.org/papers/w6906
Belleflamme, Lambert & Schwienbacher (2014), Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd, J. Business Venturingacademicdoi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
AngelInvestorsNetwork — how carry workspractitionerangelinvestorsnetwork.com
GovcLab — LP–GP matchingpractitionergovclab.com
Qubit — carry mechanicspractitionerqubit.capital
Visible.vc — carry explainerpractitionervisible.vc
OpenVC — creator-economy investorspractitioneropenvc.app
MAccelerator — revenue sharepractitionermaccelerator.la
MilX — platform money-flowpractitionermilx.io
Forbes — creator economy (two features)practitionerforbes.com
Everything PR — creator splitspractitionereverything-pr.com
Trophy — creator equitypractitionertrophy.so
Anderson (2011), Partner Compensation Systems, Managing Partner Forumpractitionermanagingpartnerforum.org
BCG — partner compensationpractitionerbcg.com
Vencon — consulting compensationpractitionervencon.com
Above the Law — Paul Weiss non-equity tierpractitionerabovethelaw.com
JD Journal — BigLaw tierspractitionerjdjournal.com
Attorneys.media — partnership structurespractitionerattorneys.media
Bloomberg Law / Stroock — law-firm collapsepractitionernews.bloomberglaw.com
Law.com — 30 years of firm collapses (timeline)practitionerlaw.com
Physician compensation & incentives (two pieces)practitionerpremierinc.com & related trade press
Kruse, Freeman & Blasi, Shared Capitalism at Work (book)booknber.org — Univ. of Chicago Press

Full research manifest with the free-source landing page each paper was captured from: literature-manifest.md (24 full-text PDFs · 28 markdown · 0 failed). Where a study-notes summary stood in for a paywalled classic, the link above points to the original published work; the notes themselves are trade/study material and are not rehosted.

Why link-out, not rehost. Part 1 is public-domain U.S. law (statutes, CFR, SEC orders) — hosting the text is fair and keeps the authority chain inspectable. Part 2 is copyrighted scholarship and trade press hosted by publishers; the correct artifact is a citation plus an outbound link to the original source. Retrieval dates are UNKNOWN rather than fabricated.

Navigate