Clinq Holdings · Creator-Distribution Platform · Deal Engine

Creator-Incentive Scoring Model

Interactive weighting of ten compensation mechanisms across nine scoring axes. Weights are a policy choice — adjust them to reflect the priority the principals place on RIA growth, SPV fill, and legal-risk avoidance. The underlying 1–5 axis scores are held fixed and are grounded in primary law archived under ./legal-sources/. Alignment and conversion axes add to the weighted total; the four risk axes subtract as penalties.
Green total = top quartile under the current weights. Red row = capital-keyed anti-pattern or any mechanism with hard legal risk = 5 (existential Exchange Act §15(a) / Ranieri exposure). Sign convention: the four risk axes (complexity, brand, hard-legal, compliance) are scored 1–5 where higher is worse, so they enter the total as negative penalties. All other axes enter positive. Click any row for its per-axis rationale and primary legal citations.
Evidence status (DRIL layer): 0 answered · 8 inferred · 3 proxy-used across 11 mechanisms. No mechanism is 'answered' on all three legal axes — there is no SEC action directly on point for a creator-fed RIA/SPV platform, so the compliance thesis is reasoning-by-distinction from Ranieri and Van Eck. answered=verbatim law · inferred=reasoned distinction · proxy-used=unarchived/secondary source (audit).